Archive for the 'Breakthrough Energy Tech' Category

A Silly Starter Vibrational Physics Reading List

Structures, Principals and Behaviors

  • (structure of…) The Kybalion: Hermetic Philosophy – the Three Initiates
  • (as “light”) Universal One – Walter Russell
  • (as electromagnetics) Tesla
  • (as electromagnetics) Ed Leedskalnin –
  • (as sound) Cymatics
  • (as form, math) Sacred Geometry
  • (as creation, gematria, consciousness) see QBL below
  • (as electromagnetic cosmos) Thunderbolts Project ex: here
  • (applied to cellular medicine) Rife – here or here
  • (applied to medicine and environment) Wilhelm Reich – The Orgone Accumulator Handbook – James DeMeo
  • (cosmological physics, toroidal dynamics) – Crossing the Event Horizon – Nassim Haramein
  • (as radio waves) John Hutchinson ex: demo here
  • (in military breakthrough energy tech) Lt. Col. Tom Bearden
  • (in use in military antigravity and propulsion projects) Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion – Dr. Paul LaViolette
  • (in use in cold fusion) The Universal Order of Creation of Matters – (and books 2,3,4) – M.T. Keshe

Amplifying Energy

  • (Microcosmic orbit, inner smile) – Montak Chia – Awaken Healing Energy Through The Tao: The Taoist Secret of Circulating Internal Power, Taoist Secrets of Love: Cultivating Male Sexual Energy
  • (deliberate creation) – Abraham-Hicks
  • (conscious healing) – Reiki
  • (subtle body theory) – Theory of Everything – Ken Wilber
  • (subtle body expansion practices) – David Deida
  • (practice) – The Middle Pillar – Israel Regardie
  • (practices) – The Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life – Drunvalo Melchizedek

Consciousness and …

  • (stages) Dragon’s Play – Charles Belyea and Steven Tainer
  • (quads, levels, lines, states, types) Integral Psychology – KW, or Integral Spirituality
  • (developmental demographics) Spiral Dynamics – C. Graves
  • (?) Course in Cosmic Consciousness – Walter Russell, or The secret of light


Related Misc
Movies: The Secret (documentary), The Sphere
Esoterica – Crowley, Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism
Subject Overviews by Manly P. Hall
Quantum mechanics
Rodin math
Schumann Resonance
Binaural beat meditations – toroidal yin yang

Quality QEG Starter Links

I’m excited about what I’ve seen from this conversation, so I want to collect and share quality links here:








Yesterday’s Honeycomb Hits

This post is made available for those doing breakthrough energy research and builds.  Enjoy!  – Maya

negative charge changes (improves) the structural coherence of matter; forming structures, when bathed in negative charge, are vastly improved/strengthened.

diatomaceous earth is negatively charged (negative ions)
honeycombs (hexagonal structures) structurally go hand-in-hand with negative charge the way parallel walls go with casimir force, the way pyramidal shapes channel double-helix energy streams.
the reason grebennikov’s headache machine works is because it generates negative ions and negative charge coherence
grebennikov’s levitation was negative charge interacting with planetary electromagnetics
according to these links, honeycombs are dialectric – that is to say – electromagnetically shielding / insulating:

Plasma Physics / Keshe Pre-Primer – As I Understand It

We’re now at a time in history where we are beginning to cure misconceptions entertained by some regarding physical world and aberrated understandings of physics.

What is plasma? What is the universe (and everything) made of? How can we, like Keshe and the 10,000 scientists playing with Keshe’s work, use this understanding for practical things like anti-gravity, creating abundant pure water, healing people, or generating matter (like gold or anything else we want) on-demand?

In hopes of helping others to understand plasma as I believe I do (or helping me to better understand it), I want to share the metaphor I’m currently using which helps me obliterate some of my own misconceptions about physics and the physical world: the Water and Whirlpool metaphor.

Originally I wrote this for the Keshe forum.

If you get something out of what I’ve written here, I’d appreciate hearing back from you. It would feed my need for companionship and confirmation that what I hope to contribute is actually being helpful to someone.

Meanwhile I’ll keep studying.


1. The Dynamic Body of Stuff – Imagine for a moment the “void” of space – not as empty, because it is not – but as a body of some sort of stuff in dynamic activity. If it helps, think of space as a body of water or smoke.

2. Movement – Within that body of water or smoke, direction of movement is possible. Look at a slow cloud of smoke or dust in sunlight, you will see strands of smoke (coherences) moving through the air. Stand in a pool of water and you can move in various directions.

3. Spiral, Spin and Donuts – So so far we have stuff in movement in a direction. That stuff in motion in one direction can fold in on itself, form a u-curve, which can then fold in on itself like a spiral with a u at the very center. Or two movements can come in from opposite directions and fold in on themselves and spiral together (yin/yang). In either case we name this coherence ‘spin’. A complex combination of spin, spiral and folding in on itself we call a “toroid” (donut).

4. Coherences – So now we have stuff in motion that can develop coherences that we call direction or spin or waves or other toroidal dynamics. A coherence is just a cluster of movement that appears organized to us.

5. Attributes and Effects – As spin coherences become large / complex enough for us to observe, we notice that they have effects and properties we can recognize, for example: density, volume, electromagnetic charge/polarity (longitudinal wave effects), and spin direction (gravity/radiation – transverse wave effects), just to name just a few. We name coherences by virtue of their different attributes and effects.

6. Increasing Complexity – When those clusters of movement come together in increasing complexity, we notice the attributes and give those clusters names. If water in the ocean is spinning together we say, “Whirlpool”. But there is no object called ‘whirlpool’ – stop the spin and the whirlpool dissipates back into the stuff from which it came (body of water). Organs are more complex combinations of coherences we call cells. Cells are complex combinations of coherences we call molecules. Molecules are complex combinations of coherences we call atoms. Atoms are complex combinations of coherences we call sub-atomic particles. Sub-atomic particles are nothing more than complex combinations of spiral, spin and toroidal coherences. So are planets, suns, solar systems, galaxies….turtles all the way up and all the way down. But our names of “things” can blind us to the reality – it’s all “stuff in spin” – whirlpools of different scales of coherence, each with unique properties (direction, density, polarity/charge) and effects (sound, color, light).  One coherence we call “hydrogen”.  Another coherence we call “oxygen”. Another we call “Sun” or “solar system” or “galaxy”, but those are just descriptions from one perspective of scale.

RECAP – Everything we observe at our scale within “space” is made up of stuff in motion, spin and the emergent vorticular dynamics. Sub-atomic particles are based in spin dynamics – stop spin and the sub-atomic particle ceases to be. Atoms are slightly more complex combinations of spin dynamics. When that complexity increases, we call it ‘elements’, then ‘particles’, then gas, liquid, solid. Sound, light, electromagnetic and scalar waves are all dynamics that we identify because we can observe them at our scale, but they are – at the core – nothing more than complex (and measurable) motion/wave/spin effects.

So here’s where we change our thinking. We don’t think simply in terms of particle/atom/sub-atomic particle/object anymore. Instead we think of “stuff in spin coherences”…like whirlpools. We can stand back and point to the movement phenomena and call it, “Whirlpool” – but really this is not a “solid” thing or a “matter” unto itself.  If the spin ceases, the whirlpool ceases to exist.  That is true of all “matter”, right down to the subatomic particles and beyond.

So we no longer think of “names” of things for a moment – let’s think only of Stuff in Movement and Vibration and Spin. Hydrogen is a coherence made up of a certain combination of spin, density, electro/magnetic charge, vibrational frequency… So is oxygen. So chemistry is the art of seeing how the combinations of attributes and effects interact and play together. Some coherences play well together and blend, some explode with force. What happens when we start playing with the more and more fundamental vibrational dynamics and coherences instead of the larger, more complex ones like particle physics does?

7. Interaction Effects – Spin coherences can interact (or not) in the same way sound vibrations can work in harmony or multiply, not work together (dissonance), cancel each other out or create new overtones. In terms of objects, we describe these interactions as gravity/attraction, repulsion, anti-matter and recombining (but these terms can sometimes blind us to the fundamental properties).

Here’s an illustration of interaction between spin coherences: watch two tornados (whirlpools of air) come near each other and one of three things will happen: Either a.) differences of spin dynamics will fail to merge – which looks to us like the two tornados repel each other or b.) the dynamics, in harmony, will merge together and combine movement to form a super-tornado (a more complex coherence), or c.) they will both dissipate (the spins will cancel each other out and the energy will dissipate into other forms). When we observe this at the scale of atomic elements, we call it Chemistry. We put 2 atoms of hydrogen (a coherence) together with 1 atom of oxygen (a coherence), the properties of each are such that they merge and become H2O. At a far, far smaller scale, we’re combining vibrational and spin dynamics to produce results. I sometimes think of it as a kind of micro-subatomic-chemistry – Fusion (combining), Fission (spinning off), etc.

This brings me closer to understanding Mr. Keshe’s work. What I’ve read so far in the patents shows how to put ingredients together (some which are the result of interactions) which – in turn – results in the attributes or effects that we want (current, gravitational effects, directional propulsion, matter generation, charge effects which result in health impacts).

This is possible *** because *** we are playing at the more fundamental level of the vibrational dynamics and resulting effects. This is hardly “new” science (for starters, see the work of Walter Russell, Frank Znidarsic, Tom Bearden’s results in scalar wave research, or the ‘cold fusion’ successes that TPTB hurried to trash earlier this century, just to name a few). We’re simply playing with coherences happening at scales that mainstream science has yet come to master.

So now we come back to where we started – #1 on the page. If everything is a product of movement, motion, spin and coherences of “stuff”…then…. What is that “stuff”? The ancients called it aether. So far, I understand it as Plasma – I see plasma as the greater field and ‘stuff’ within which coherences can happen. These mini-whirlpools will each have different properties and effects. Mix certain coherences together and they will blend, or not, to create other coherent results.

From this perspective it’s sometimes counterproductive to think of things in terms of “solid, liquid, gas, etc.” – instead, it helps me to think of those things as varying degrees of complex vibrational dynamics in interaction.

This helps me understand more from Mr. Keshe’s work than others I’ve met.

Here’s an example:

Some people have difficulty understanding “the wall” Mr. Keshe refers to. When I think of two tornados or two whirlpools, the ‘wall’ becomes self-evident to me. There is a zone between the two where the spin and other attributes are not identical, and there’s not enough pressure to force them together, so they don’t merge. We call this “repelling”, but really it’s just the attributes finding zones more in harmony with their own. This is the same between two magnetic fields, or the apparent solidity that means you can’t put your hand through a wall. The intensity of spin of two coherences can bounce off each other. If you press the two objects together, the apparent boundaries between the two coherences wall will compress together more and more tightly, but without a fundamental change of properties or sufficient force they will continue to not merge. On the other hand, if you learn the proper frequencies of things and how to tune them, as Ed Leedskalnin and John Hutchinson did for playtime, then you can merge objects together and get historically inexplicable gravitational effects.

That brings us to another example:

How can Keshe’s work claim gravitational effects? Well that’s easy. The effect of a spinning object on its environment means it can kick off “energies” (waves radiating outward = radiation), and it can draw in “energies” (gravity).  Large boats have been taken down by large whirlpools. There’s no mysterious force inside the center of the maelstrom; the direction of activity is convergent, so anything within that field can be drawn into the same direction.  Anti-gravity isn’t magic either – it’s simply putting two coherences against each other in a way that are dissonant. The spin effects push against each other, which appears to us like anti-gravity.

Here’s another:

How might this generate matter? Well that concept is easy now too. The effect of a whirlpool on its environment means it can kick off “energies” (ex: put water on a fan and watch it fly off when the fan spins, or look at “waves” that radiate outward from a radio tower = radiation), and in the micro-chemistry of dynamics re-combining the newly formed coherences can produce atomic layers of elements that we can recognize. This is how we get graphene on the inside of the coke bottle reactors.

These are just a few examples of how using the Whirlpool metaphor has helped me to make more sense of what I’m reading from Mr. Keshe’s work. I no longer see matter as static or solid, rather I think of all things in terms of constellations of activity like whirlpools – where some are large enough that we can perceive them at our scale (and we call them solids, liquids, gases, elements, atoms etc) and some are not (yet) perceptible to us given our current scientific advances.  

I hope that this has somehow helped you make more sense of how we can use Mr. Keshe’s work or plasma physics in practical ways.

Blessings to you,

Keshe Video Part 02

In this post I started reading Keshe’s Patent, and in this post I have Part 02 for you.


You can also see the Keshe Video Part 02 Here.

Common Threads in New Science

What you’re about to read are topics I have gathered from my research and studies – and found in common – among many mainstream scientists, military experts, thinkers, and lineages including: quantum physics, string theory, Cymatics, Steven Hawking, Electric Universe theory, Marco Rodin, Ed Leedskalnin, Nassim Haramein, John Hutchinson, Tesla, Paul LaViolette, Walter Russell, rexresearch, “free energy” builds, Dr. Thomas Valone, pre-Sumerian history and ancient texts like the Book of Enoch and The Kybalion, the Qabala, sacred geometry, Viktor Grebennikov, Royal Rife, plasma physics and most recently Rupert Sheldrake, Viktor Schauberger, M.T. Keshe and Tom Bearden. (Note: 2014 I’ve added Keppe Motors and David Yurth’s work to my studies, as well as the speakers from the Breakthrough Energy Movement gatherings – BEM – in Colorado.)

1. The universe is not an empty “vacuum” as we previously thought.

Activity is happening beneath our current scale of observation, but that we are now beginning to discover. Actually the universe is more like a frothing ocean of furiously bubbling activity. That furiously bubbling activity often spins together into coherences that we recognize just as water spins together to make whirlpools or air spins together to make tornados. Coherent activities we witness at our scale include sound, light, other subatomic particles, atoms, and then more complex coherences such as particles and elements. Elements cluster together to form increasing complex stellar bodies; stellar bodies spin and whirl together into cosmic phenomena such as galaxies and quasars. Like breath, where the inhale is the spin bringing a coherence together, the exhale of the universe is dissolution, radiation, expansion, disappearing to our observation. End the spinning and the whirlpool dissipates back into the greater body. Electrons appear and disappear, previously coherent suns ultimately dissolve back into the Source. What we perceive as ‘solid’, in fact all bodies we can perceive at our scale, are made up of the stuff of cosmic ocean in the same way a whirlpool is made up of the body of water it resides in. This cosmic ocean stuff is referred to by many names: aether, zero point, plasma, ain, etc. Think about Einstein’s reference to the “fabric” of spacetime. What stuff is that “fabric” made of?

2. To understand new science, start thinking in terms of vibration, spin, polarity, waves and donuts.

Vibration, spin, polarity and the resulting toroid and wave dynamics happening within this cosmic ocean stuff (plasma, aether, zero point, etc.) are at the heart of the new emerging scientific awakening.

3. There are things that operate (at least 10 times) faster than the speed of light, and now we’re beginning to discover them.

By evidence of this: we only observe light when it comes into contact with some other coherent matter which slows it down (R.L. Poole). Light is the result of coherent plasma in friction with its surrounding environment of coherences (like atmosphere or air) (M.T. Keshe). This is why space looks dark, and not full of light. We know the size of our expanding universe; when you calculate the speed needed for “the fabric” of space to have expanded to that distance, it calculates to about 10 times the speed of light. Something is able to travel faster than light, or our known universe would be about 10 times smaller.

4. Gravity is the same activity as magnetism, only in its reverse polarity.

(Leedskalnin, Russell, Keshe, Bearden). While it’s useful to talk about gravity as a unique phenomena, remove magnetic polarity (and spin) and you remove the phenomena; there is no stand-alone gravitational force. Gravity depends on magnetism. Gravity is to magnetism what East is to West, or negative electricity charges (ions) are to positive charges (anions). Imagine a city, where all of the cars from the suburbs cohere during work hours. If you were a giant watching the cars, you might think that space time had bent and that all the cars were gravitated to the center, when in reality each car is simply moving forward to a destination matching the charge of the driver. At dinner time all of the cars will repel out of the city back toward the suburbs again, but again it’s still the forward motion of the cars in response to the charge of the driver. Likewise, coherent bodies only move forward (we call this magnetism). When they are moving forward toward each other we name the behavior “gravity”, and when the cars are going away from each other we call the repulsion force “magnetism”.

5. All coherent bodies are “magnets”.

From sub-atomic particles to the largest cosmic bodies – are coherent bodies all “magnetic” in nature (which is to say that they each carry at least three positive/negative charge polarity dynamic, made up of smaller coherences also with at least three charge polarity dynamics). Leedskalnin called the smallest coherences “magnetons”. Keshe refers to three sub-coherences of plasma (the primary whole coherence) as, “matter, dark matter, and antimatter”. Science has now successfully produced “wood magnets” and “plastic magnets”, where the particles are aligned within the substance in such a way that it attracts and repels like substances just like a magnet does. Give yourself the right electr-omagnetic-scalar charges, and you would float like helium. (Hutchinson Effect)

6. Wave dynamics can reliably be used to experiment with, and manipulate, other wave dynamics.

Strike a nail (Leedskalnin) or certain salts (Steven DuFresne) and you will produce electromagnetic effects. Use sound to resonate atoms at correct frequencies and you produce either levitation or liquification of solid matter (Hutchinson Effect). See also, acoustic levitation and cymatics; in both cases sound is used to manipulate “solid” matter (complex combinations of spin, wave, and vorticular dynamics).

10/11/12 – I’ll update this post with additional items as I continue my studies and experiments and crystalize more common threads.

10/26/12 – I’ve added a new post, titled Draft – Foundational Physics, that adds to this list and that I may break into parts for mainstream readers later.


Video – Power For All via Keshe Technology

Power: The ability to easily and fluidly mobilize resources to meet needs (in a way that works for everyone and the super-system at large).

I want Power for all beings.

One of the most powerful technologies I see being applied today is the Keshe Foundation technologies. These contribute to power for all races by attending to needs for food, water, energy, waste management, propulsion/levitation, healthcare, and more.

To better understand M.T. Keshe’s advances and inventions, I’m reading his patents and books.

To share his work with others, and to find buddies to discuss and build based on his work, I’m posting videos about Keshe’s work.

In this recording you’ll hear this Keshe excerpt:

Bibliographic data: WO2008113392  (A1) ― 2008-09-25
Title: Gravitational and Energy System
Section: Abstract

You can find this patent online here:

(I occasionally corrected phrases to be slightly more congruent with colloquial Native English ways of speaking.)

For more about M.T. Keshe’s work:

– Brief Introduction –
– In-Depth Introduction –

My Keshe Video Playlist
(includes the plastic bottle reactor demo and Keshe interviews from Sept 2012):

You can purchase books published by M.T. Keshe here:

Do you want more of my recordings? Each Keshe book costs me $80 plus the time to record, edit and post videos. If you’d like more, please help – you can help me get the next book or buy me a cup of coffee or dinner or just say “thank you!” by sending paypal gifts to me at – mayagayam – at gmail dot com.


You can also see the Keshe Video Here.

Thank you Love!

Thank you to the friends who help keep my content flowing. To share your love with me, please Click Here to Donate. Thank you <3

Quick Browse

RSS Quote of the Day

  • Isaac Asimov
    "I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them."
January 2019
« Dec    

RSS My Recent Twitters

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

All Entries Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Gail Taylor. All Rights Reserved.